Writ petition against a school and education department; counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw, and the Delhi High Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~99
HIMANSHI ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Darshnik Narang and Mr. V.K. Tandon, Advocates
versus
BAL MANDIR PUBLIC SCHOOL & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Kamal Gupta, Mr. Tripti Gupta, Mr. Sparsh Agarwal, Mr. Manish Vashist and Mr. Nikhil Kukreja, Advocates for R1
Ms. Nikita Vir, Mr. Rishabh Srivastava and Mr. Kartik Sharma for Mr. Santosh Kr. Tripathi, Standing Counsel, for DoE
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R % 11.03.2024
1. Mr. Darshnik Narang, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks to withdraw the writ petition.
2. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
MARCH 11, 2024/yg
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/03/2024 at 11:48:13
Himanshi
Bal Mandir Public School
Anr.
C.Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
