The petition sought directions for the school to provide all EWS entitlements. Counsel for the respondent assured compliance for the next session, leading the petitioner to withdraw the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~39
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MASTER PRASHANT & ANR. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Vivek Kumar Tandon, Mr. Darshnik Narang and Ms. Prerna Tandon, Advs.
versus
NEW ST. MICHAEL ACADEMY & ANR. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Anil Singh, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Utkarsh Singh and Ms. Prasansha Sharma, Advs. for Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, SC (Civil) for DoE
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R (ORAL) % 07.03.2024
W.P.(C) 3013/2024
1. The prayer in this writ petition was only for a direction to Respondent 1 school to provide all EWS entitlements to the petitioners.
2. Mr. Tandon, learned Counsel for the petitioners on instructions of his clients submits that substantial EWS entitlements stand provided to his clients, though there are still some entitlements which remain. Mr. Anil Singh, learned Counsel for the Respondent 1 school disputes the fact that there are any entitlements remaining to be granted and submits that all EWS entitlements have been provided to
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By: AJIT KUMAR W.P.(C) 3013/2024 Signing Da te:1 9.03.2024 17:16:25
Page 1 of 2
the petitioners.
3. Nonetheless, Mr. Anil Singh submits that, as the present academic session is coming to an end, for the next academic session, the petitioners shall be provided all entitlements available to EWS students in accordance with the RTE Act and the Circulars issued by the DoE from time to time.
4. In that view of the matter, Mr. Tandon does not press this writ petition any further. The petition stands disposed of accordingly.
CM APPL. 12435/2024
5. The application does not survive for consideration and stands disposed of.
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
MARCH 7, 2024 rb
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By: AJIT KUMAR W.P.(C) 3013/2024 Signing Da te:1 9.03.2024 17:16:25
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the school was obliged to provide remaining EWS entitlements to the petitioners?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MASTER PRASHANT & ANR.
NEW ST. MICHAEL ACADEMY & ANR.
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
