Writ petition against CBSE and others; grievance stood satisfied, so counsel sought leave to withdraw. The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn without deciding any issue.
Petition permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32
..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Chellani, Ms. Ananya Garg and Ms. Dhriti Gupta, Advs.
GAURAV CHELLANI
versus
CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION(CBSE) & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Atul Kumar and Ms. Aditi Gupta, Advs. for Respondents 1 and 2 Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, ASC for R-4
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
%
O R D E R 07.03.2024
1. Ms. Dhriti Gupta, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that, as the grievance in this writ petition stands satisfied, the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition.
2. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
MARCH 7, 2024 rb
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/03/2024 at 11:24:14
GAURAV CHELLANI
CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION(CBSE)
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
