This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
versus
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nikita Vir & Mr. Rishabh Srivastava, Advs. for Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Standing Counsel (GNCTD)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR O R D E R % 11.03.2024
1. Ms. Nazia Parveen, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the petitioner has been granted permanent admission by Respondent 2 school, the grievance in the petition does not survive for consideration. She accordingly seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
3. Needless to say, should any grievance survive, the petitioner can always approach this Court in accordance with law.
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
MARCH 11, 2024 ab Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/03/2024 at 11:50:55
Master Kanishk (Minor)
Govt of NCT of Delhi
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
