Disposed

Sunny v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC10 Sept 2024W.P.(C)/11666/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a Scheduled Caste Certificate based on his father's 1972 certificate, which was verified as a photocopy without an original. Court directed respondent to verify the original's authenticity before processing application.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to verify original certificate with issuing department and then legally process petitioner's application for Scheduled Caste Certificate.

Sunny Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~10

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 11666/2024 SUNNY .....Petitioner

¶4

Through: Mr. Rohit Gupta, Mr. Gopal Agonia, Advocates.

¶5

versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Harshita Nathrani, Advocate for Mr. Sameer Vashisht, ASC (Civil) for GNCTD.

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

O R D E R

10.09.2024

The Petitioner’s grievance is that he has not been issued a Scheduled Caste Certificate. In this regard, a status report dated 7^th September, 2024 has been filed by Respondent No. 3/SDM North East, Seelampur, which reads as under:

¶11

“1. That it is relevant to mention that Sunny S/o Sh. Ram Chandra applied for a Scheduled Caste (SC) certificate on 09.06.2024 in the office of Tehsildar, Seelampur and verified his documents on 14.06.2024. He provided his father’s Scheduled Caste certificate (Sh. Ram Chandra S/o Sh. Chedi Lal), which was issued on 24.02.1972, as a supporting document. As the old records at the Tehsildar office (Seelampur) are available only from 09.09.1996 onwards, the verification of this caste certificate was referred to the CCS Branch of the Revenue (HQ). A reply was received stating that the supporting caste certificate provided was not a photocopy of the original as sign of issuing authority was not there on certificate.

¶12

2. On 04.09.2024, an online query was raised requesting the applicant to upload the original copy of the certificate and the applicant was also informed about this. On 06.09.2024, the applicant visited the office and said that he would upload the original certificate and have it verified. However, the original caste certificate was not uploaded as of the evening of 06.09.2024. Further, as soon as the petitioner will submit the required documents though online portal the certificate will be issued.”

¶13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/09/2024 at 12:45:55

¶14

From the above, it is evident that the Petitioner has relied on a document purported to be his father’s caste certificate as a supporting document, however, he has not produced the original of the said certificate for verification. In these circumstances, the Petitioner’s request for caste certificate has not been granted.

¶15

Counsel for Petitioner has handed over across the board a laminated copy of the Petitioner’s father’s caste certificate, which has been perused and returned to him. It is clearly noticed that it is not an original but only a true copy. Counsel for Petitioner asserts that the said caste certificate dates back to the year 1972, and he is not in possession of the original document. 4. In the opinion of the Court, even in absence of the original of the supporting document, the Petitioner must still fulfil the requirements mandated for issuance of a caste certificate. Accordingly, the Petitioner is directed to follow up with the concerned department which has issued the original caste certificate of his father. At the same time, the Respondents are directed to send a communication to the concerned Office of the Deputy Commissioner to verify whether the certificate No. 1351/CCS/72/CASTE dated 24^th February, 1972 issued in the name of Ram Chander, S/o Shri Chedi Lal, R/o RA/12/14 Lal Kila Delhi-6, was issued by the Department. Upon receiving a response, the Respondents shall process the Petitioner’s application in accordance with law.

¶16

With the above directions, the present petition is disposed of.

¶17

SANJEEV NARULA, J

¶18

SEPTEMBER 10, 2024/ab

¶19

Sunny v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunny v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sangeeta Bakshi & Ors. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Urmila Jaiswal Vs Employees State Insurance Corporation and Ors.

Air Force Naval Housing Board Vs Central Bank of India Branch Air Force Station & Ors.

Mmtc Pamp India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs the Local Committee South District & Ors.

Akhil Dilli Prathmik Shikshak Sangh Regd & Anr. Vs Govt.of N.C.T.Delhi & Ors.

Sanjay Yadav Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Msc Agency (I) Pvt. Ltd. Vs UOI and Ors.

M/S Osm Projects Private Limited, through Its Director Surender Sharma & Anr. Vs Union of India through Chairman Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs Cbic Departme

Mmtc Pamp India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs the Local Committee South District & Ors.

Shri Balbir Singh Mann Vs Govt NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Habibullah Serat and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Union Public Service Commission Vs Siddhartha Bishnoi

Sunil Bhardwaj Vs Cpio, Union Bank of India

Anil Ahluwalia Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.