Petitioner sought a direction to the Central Information Commission to urgently list his second appeal under the RTI Act concerning stock statements of Union Bank of India. The court declined to monitor CIC's cause list and disposed of the petition by directing CIC to consider his urgency representations in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~66
SUNIL BHARDWAJ .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Vivek Gupta, Advocate with Petitioner in person.
versus
CPIO, UNION BANK OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. O. P. Gaggar and Mr. Sachindra Karn, Advocates.
CORAM:
%
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D E R 10.09.2024
1 “CIC”
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2024 at 12:25:26
SANJEEV NARULA, J
SEPTEMBER 10, 2024 d.negi
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2024 at 12:25:27
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the CIC should be directed to list the petitioner's second appeal for urgent hearing.
Whether the petitioner's representations seeking an out-of-turn hearing should be considered by the CIC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sunil Bhardwaj
CPIO, Union Bank of India
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
