Petitioner sought direction to decide his pending visa application. Court directed Respondents to decide the representation within three weeks, while keeping maintainability and merits open.
Respondents directed to decide the pending representation within three weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~73
HABIBULLAH SERAT AND ORS
.....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Javed Khan, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rohan Jaitley, CGSC with Mr. Hussain Taqvi, GP with Mr. Dev Pratap Shahi, Ms. Ranjana Jetley and Mr. Yogya Bhatia, Advocates for R-1 to 3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R
%
09.09.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2024 at 12:22:31
the Petitioner has been blacklisted till 26th July, 2025.
SANJEEV NARULA, J
SEPTEMBER 9, 2024 nk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2024 at 12:22:31
Habibullah Serat
Union of India
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
