Disposed

Diksha Singh v. National Testing Agency (Nta) & Anr.

Delhi HC9 Aug 2024W.P.(C)/11066/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition by a CUET candidate seeking addition of 30 marks in mathematics/applied mathematics and reconsideration of admission. The Court directed respondents to treat the petition as a representation, decide it expeditiously by 13.08.2024 with intimation to the petitioner, and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to treat writ petition as petitioner's representation and decide it expeditiously by 13.08.2024 under intimation; liberty to approach Court again.

Diksha Singh Vs National Testing Agency (Nta) & Anr. — Education and Admissions | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~48

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11066/2024 & CM APPL. 45728/2024 DIKSHA SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, Mr. Ajay, Advocates.

¶3

versus

¶4

NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY (NTA) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Khanna, Standing Counsel with Ms. Pragya Bhushan, Mr. Karandeep Singh & Mr. Tarandeep Singh, Advocates for NTA. Mr. Mohinder JS Rupal & Mr. Hardik Rupal, Advocates for University of Delhi.

¶5

CORAM:

¶6

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

¶7

O R D E R

¶8

% 09.08.2024

¶9

CM APPL. 45729/2024 (exemption)

¶10

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶11

Application stands disposed of.

¶12

W.P.(C) 11066/2024 & CM APPL. 45728/2024

¶13

The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, praying as follows:

¶14

“1. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ/ order or direction directing the respondent no 1 to add 30 marks to the Petitioner's result in "mathematics"/ applied mathematics and declare results afresh.

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/08/2024 at 14:30:23

¶16

ii. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ/ order or direction directing the respondent no 1 to consider the representation of the Petitioner and give a reasoned reply and add 30 marks to the Petitioner's result in "mathematics" I applied mathematics and declare results afresh.

¶17

iii. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ/ order or direction directing the respondent no 2 to consider the petitioner's case for admission based on the reconsideration/redeclaration/ verification of the Petitioner's CUET results/Petitioner's result m "mathematics"/ applied mathematics even after the cut off dates for admission.

¶18

iv. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ/ order or direction directing the respondent no 1 to verify the marks of the petitioner herein and add 30 marks to the Petitioner's result in "mathematics"/ applied mathematics and declare results afresh after verification with their declared answer sheet.”

¶19

Issue notice. Mr. Sanjay Khanna, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondent no. 1 and Mr. Mohinder JS Rupal, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondent no. 2.

¶20

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that the representation of the petitioner, which is pending before the respondents, has not yet been decided yet and there is urgency in the present matter. 6. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the respondents are directed to treat the present writ petition as a representation, on behalf of the petitioner, which is to be decided expeditiously by 13.08.2024, under intimation to the petitioner herein.

¶21

Furthermore, the petitioner is at liberty to approach this Court again,

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/08/2024 at 14:30:23

¶24

if any grievance arises.

¶25

No further relief is prayed for.

¶26

In view of the above, the writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

¶27

The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.

¶28

SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J

¶29

AUGUST 9, 2024/ at

¶30

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶31

This is a digitally signed order.

¶32

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/08/2024 at 14:30:23

Diksha Singh v. National Testing Agency (Nta) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Diksha Singh v. National Testing Agency (Nta) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S S Tanwar Vs Registrar Cooperative Societies & Ors.

Neha Shorawal Vs Bses Yamuna Power Limited and Another

Mohd Moim & Ors. Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Abodh Kumar Mandal Vs the Govt. of NCT of Delhi through Its Chief Secretary & Ors.

Vishakha Arya Vs Union of India & Ors.

Reetwige Rishav Vs Union of India and Anr.

Neelkanth Steel and Alloys Vs Asstt. Commissioner Ofincome Tax, Circle 49(1), & Ors.

Vinod Kumar Chawla Vs Union of India & Ors.

Swati Vs Abhishek Gupta

Meena Paul & Anr. Vs Parmesh Nag

Aditya Pvt. Iti & Anr. Vs Directorate General of Training Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship & Anr.

Mohd Kashif & Anr. Vs Jalaluddin

Mannat Abbot Vs National Testing Agency & Ors.

Sanchari Mukhopadhyay and Ors. Vs Jawaharlal Nehru University and Anr.