The petitioner withdrew the writ petition as requisite amounts were paid to the respondent. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn, and interim orders were vacated.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
M/S TRIG DETECTIVES PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Shashank, Advocate. (Mob.-7503576834)
versus
SH. VISHWAMITRA SHARMA ..... Respondent
Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R % 05.02.2020
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that requisite amounts have been paid to the respondent/workman. Hence, he would not like to press the petition.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
RW
FEBRUARY 05, 2020
M/S TRIG DETECTIVES PRIVATE LIMITED
SH. VISHWAMITRA SHARMA
NAJMI WAZIRI
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
