Mohammad Ikhalaque v. Uioin of India & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed for lack of petitioner presence indicating lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Avnish Singh, Senior Panel Counsel for UOI. Mr. U.N. Singh, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R % 04.02.2020
No one is present on behalf of the petitioner. No one was present for the petitioner even on the last date of hearing. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter.
Dismissed.
G.S.SISTANI, J
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J
FEBRUARY 04, 2020 Ne
Mohammad Ikhalaque
Union of India
G.S.Sistani
Anup Jairam Bhambhani
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court