Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition as the subject matter grievance of shifting a grievant to the ground floor had been redressed. Court allowed withdrawal by dismissing the petition.
Petitioner granted leave to withdraw the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
MADHULATA MALLICK ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Paras Jain, Advocate
versus
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL (NDMC) AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. A.K. Sharma, ASC for NDMC
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R
% 04.02.2020
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and Smt. Shanti Devi has been shifted to the ground floor in Room No. 9, he seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
FEBRUARY 04, 2020 ‘ rs’
MADHULATA MALLICK
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL (NDMC)
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
