Manish Sharma v. M/S Apparels India Na Dnar
Case brief
What is this about?
Suit for permanent injunction and damages was decreed in default as defendants confirmed business closure, vacated premises, and denied any connection with the alleged infringer via their court statements and affidavit.
What did the court decide?
Present suit is decreed in accordance with the defendants' statements and undertakings regarding closure and vacating premises.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
#1
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CS(COMM) 68/2018 & I.A. 20732/2013
MANISH SHARMA ..... Plaintiff
- Through Dr. Chandra Shekhar, Advocate
versus
M/S APPARELS INDIA NA DNAR ..... Defendant Through Mr. Vikas Bhatia, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R % 10.01.2019
Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining passing off, dilution and tarnishment, rendition of accounts of profits, damages and delivery up.
On 12th October, 2018, defendant no. 2, who is the Sole Proprietor of defendant no. 1 had made a statement before learned Joint Registrar that she had stopped the business and would not use mark VIVAH COLLECTION or the mark VC as mentioned in paragraph 10 of the plaint.
Coram
Manmohan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court