Plaintiffs sought leave to withdraw the suit citing defendants' liquidation. The court granted permission to withdraw, dismissed the suit, and disposed of pending applications.
Permission to withdraw suit granted; suit dismissed; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~O-13
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MICROSOFT CORPORATION & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr.Pravin Anand and Mr.Aashish Somasi, Advocates
versus
MR.ANAND MOHAN & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Ms.Girija Krishan Varma, Advocate for D-2 to D-5
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R % 11.01.2019
Learned counsel for the plaintiffs seeks permission to withdraw the suit considering that the defendants are in liquidation.
The suit is dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending applications are disposed of.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
JANUARY 11, 2019 ds
2 issues framed by the court
Whether permission should be granted to withdraw the suit due to defendants being in liquidation.
Whether the pending applications should be disposed of upon withdrawal of the suit.
J.R. Midha
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
