The court dismissed the present suit in default on account of non-prosecution, observing that no evidence was led by the plaintiff despite framed issues and absences for the last two hearing dates.
Suit dismissed for default and non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10
$~
M/S KINGSMEN FAIRTECH INTERNATIONAL (P) LTD ..... Plaintiff
Through: None.
versus
M/S BROADCAST ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS INDIA LTD ..... Defendant
Through Mr Rajeev Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Saket Chandra, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R % 11.01.2019
Despite issues being framed on 17th February, 2017, no evidence has been led by the plaintiff.
None had appeared for the plaintiff for the last two dates of hearing. Even today, none is present for the plaintiff.
Consequently, present suit is dismissed in default and on account of non-prosecution.
MANMOHAN, J
JANUARY 11, 2019 js
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit should be dismissed for failure to adduce evidence after framing of issues.
M/S KINGSMEN FAIRTECH INTERNATIONAL (P) LTD
M/S BROADCAST ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS INDIA LTD
Manmohan
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
