Disposed

Salvatore Ferragamo S.P.A. v. Shruti Mangla & Ors.

Delhi HC10 Jan 2019CS(COMM)/1202/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Suit for permanent injunction regarding trademark infringement was resolved through mediation. Parties executed a Settlement Agreement on 14 December 2018. The Court found the agreement lawful and in terms of Section 89 CPC, decreed the suit and disposed of pending applications.

What did the court decide?

Suit decreed in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 14 December 2018; pending applications disposed of.

Salvatore Ferragamo S.P.A. Vs Shruti Mangla… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Delhi HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶4

- CS(COMM) 1202/2018 & I.A. 14839-14842/2018

¶5

SALVATORE FERRAGAMO S.P.A. ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Prithvi Singh, Advocate

¶6

versus

¶7

SHRUTI MANGLA & ORS. ..... Defendants Through Mr. Kapil Kumar Giri, Advocate

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

¶9

O R D E R % 10.01.2019

¶10

The present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, passing off, dilution, damages, rendition of accounts, delivery up etc.

¶11

On 1^st November, 2018, the present suit was referred to the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre.

¶12

Mediation in the present case has been successful through the efforts of Ms. Kajal Chandra, Advocate-Mediator.

¶13

A Settlement Agreement has been executed between the parties on 14^th December, 2018.

¶14

With consent of both the counsel, it is clarified that the expression „advertised‟ in Clause 4(g) of the aforesaid Settlement Agreement means publication either in press or in the social media.

¶15

It is pertinent to mention that the Supreme Court in Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Cherian Varkey Construction Co. (P) Ltd., (2010) 8 SCC 24 while dealing with Section 89 of the CPC observed that the settlement agreement will have to be placed before the Court for recording it and in disposing of the suit in its terms, the Court should apply the principle of Order 23 Rule 3 of the CPC and make a decree in terms of the settlement in regard to the subject matter of the suit, to make such settlement effective.

¶16

This Court is satisfied that the compromise between the parties contained in the aforesaid Settlement Agreement satisfies the requirements of Order 23 Rule 3 CPC. The compromise contained in the aforesaid Settlement Agreement is lawful and therefore, this Court does not find any impediment in decreeing the present suit in terms of the aforesaid Settlement Agreement.

¶17

Consequently, present suit is decreed in terms of the aforesaid Settlement Agreement dated 14^th December, 2018 executed between the parties, which is marked as Ex.C-1. Registry is directed to prepare a decree sheet in terms thereof.

¶18

Registry of this Court is also directed to issue to learned counsel for the plaintiff a certificate authorizing him/her to receive back from the Collector full amount of the Court fee paid by them in the present suit.

¶19

With the aforesaid observations, present suit and all pending applications stand disposed of.

¶20

MANMOHAN, J

¶21

JANUARY 10, 2019 rn

Salvatore Ferragamo S.P.A. v. Shruti Mangla & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Salvatore Ferragamo S.P.A. v. Shruti Mangla & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Versatile Commotrade Private Limited Vs Sh Balraj

M/S J.D. Fashion Wear Vs Jai Vasu Garments & Ors.

Aktiebolaget Volvo & Ors. Vs Plexo Lubricants Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Hsil Limited Vs Gujrat Ceramic Industries & Anr.

M/S Kingsmen Fairtech International (P) Ltd. Vs M/S Broadcast Engineering Consultants India Ltd.

Microsoft Corporation & Anr. Vs Mr.Anand Mohan & Anr.

M/S Bhushan Steel Ltd. Vs M/S Radical Europe Limited

M/S K.Cj & Co. Vs M/S Kulubi Impex

Sap Aktiengesellschaft & Anr. Vs M/S Global Enterprises and Anr.

M/S J.D. Fashion Wear Vs Jai Vasu Garments & Ors.

Tekla Corporation & Anr. Vs Joegy Joseph & Ors.

Smt Ritu Kumari Vs Sh. Devender & Ors.

Chasvinder Singh Vs Kunal Nagpal & Anr.

Avinash Chopra & Another Vs Ashwini Kumar & Another