Dr Rachana v. NCT Delhi & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL)…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
DR RACHANA ..... Petitioner Through Mr. N. Hariharan, Senior Advocate and Mr. Aarshdeep, Mr. Siddarth S. Yadav, Mr. Prateek Bhalla and Mr. Varun Dewsal, and Mr. Arjun Dewan and Mr. Arjun Mukherjee, Advocates versus NCT DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr. Chaitanya Gosain and Mr. Anand Thumbayil, Advocates for Respondent No. 1 Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Mir, Mr. Suhaan Mukherjee and Mr. Ravinder Singh, Advocates for State of West Bengal Mr. Amresh Goyal (legal) and Mr. C.R. Meena, Central Jail, Tihar SI Nadeem Akhtan IO of the Case No. 52/2017, P.S.: Kolkata
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI
O R D E R % 12.07.2019
CRL. M.A. 30868/2019 (exemption)
Exemption granted, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
CRL.M.A. 30867/2019 (interim release)
After some arguments, Mr. N. Hariharan, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to institute appropriate proceedings as may be available in law.
Leave and liberty granted.
The application is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
BRIJESH SETHI, J
JULY 12, 2019 savita
Dr. Rachana
NCT Delhi
Siddharth Mridul
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court