This was a petition for custody of a minor child. The court recorded the mutual agreement of the parents to live separately with the husband maintaining the wife, and to grant visitation rights to grandparents, then disposed of the petition.
Petition and application disposed of based on mutual consent recorded in court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9
$~
MEENAKSHI ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Vishesh Wadhwa with Mr.Aditya Swarup Aggarwal, Ms.Swadha Gupta and Mr.Mohit Bhandari, Advocates.
versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel for the State with Mr.Chaitanya Gosain and Mr.Anand, Advocates. Inspector Sanjay Kumar, PS Kishangarh. % Date of Decision: 16th July, 2019
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
J U D G M E N T
MANMOHAN, J: (Oral)
W.P.(Crl.) 1905/2019
Page 1 of 2
Court that he would maintain the petitioner as well as his two children in good health to the best of his ability.
MANMOHAN, J
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J
JULY 16, 2019 KA
W.P.(Crl.) 1905/2019
Page 2 of 2
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a custody dispute between parents can be resolved by recording mutual consent for visitation rights.
Petitioner's right to reside with respondent no. 2 provided they live separately.
Agreement of parties regarding visitation of minor children to paternal grandparents.
Meenakshi
State
Respondent No. 2
Manmohan
Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
