This order notes the parties' settlement and acceptance of relief. The petitioners received partial payment and cheques, and one respondent undertook to vacate possession of property within four days. Findings left.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20&21
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of Order : 07.03.2019 + CONT.CAS(C) 357/2018 SAVITA BANSAL & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Ms. Shalini Kapoor with Mr. Dikshant Khanna and Ms. Bindita Chaturveid, Advocates
versus
NARENDER BARMECHA & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Debmalya Banerjee, Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Kartik Bhatnagar and Mr. Avival Kapoor, Advocates for Respondent nos. 1,3 to 5 Mr. Subodh Kumar Pathak, Advocate for Respondent no.2 AND
versus
NARENDRA BARMECHA & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Debmalya Banerjee, Mr.
Page 1 of 3
CONT.CAS.357/2018 & 644/2018
Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Kartik Bhatnagar and Mr. Avival Kapoor, Advocates for Respondent nos. 1,3 to 5 Mr. Subodh Kumar Pathak, Advocate for Respondent no.2
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL O R D E R
%
07.03.2019
Page 2 of 3
CONT.CAS.357/2018 & 644/2018
and Cheque Nos. 004487 and 004485 dated 04.03.2019 of Rs. 2 lakhs each drawn on DCB Bank, Andheri-West (004) Branch, Mumbai-400058 to the learned counsel for the petitioner.
VINOD GOEL, J
MARCH 07, 2019 savita
Page 3 of 3
CONT.CAS.357/2018 & 644/2018
Savita Bansal & Ors.
Narendra Barmecha & Ors.
Vinod Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
