Dismissed
Rajender Kumar v. Vijay Kumar
Delhi HCCONT.CAS(C)/191/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner's petition was disposed of after the respondent accepted the notice but did not represent any substantive issue requiring adjudication.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~39
¶2
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
% Date of Order : 06.03.2019 + CONT.CAS(C) 191/2019 RAJENDER KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. N.S. Dalal and Ms. T. Banerjee, Advs.
¶4
versus
¶5
VIJAY KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Satyakam, Additional Standing counsel for Govt. of NCT of Delhi. Insp. Pramendra Singh in person.
¶6
CORAM:
¶7
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL O R D E R
¶8
% 06.03.2019
¶9
- On an advance copy of the petition having been served, Mr. Satyakam, Additional Standing Counsel for Government of NCT of Delhi (ASC), has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent. Notice. He accepts the notice.
¶10
- Learned ASC submits that in terms of the order dated 19.11.2018, the petitioner had appeared before the Deputy Commissioner of Police (South), on 27.11.2018 (forenoon).
¶11
Page 1 of 2
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Rajender Kumar
- respondent
Vijay Kumar
Coram
AI extract
Vinod Goel
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court