Petitioner sought to drop contempt petition as interim directions were complied with. Court disposed of petition and ordered continued compliance with interim order.
Contempt petition disposed; interim order to continue to be complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
KISHAN CHAND ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sahib Singh Mehandru, Advocate
versus
RAJEEV RAI BHATNAGAR ..... Respondent Through Mr. Vijay Joshi, Sr.panel counsel with Mr. Vivek Kumar, Law Officer, CRPF
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 06.03.2019
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
SANJEEV NARULA, J.
MARCH 06, 2019 mw
KISHAN CHAND
RAJEEV RAI BHATNAGAR
S. MURALIDHAR
SANJEEV NARULA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
