Single-paragraph order where the petitioner did not appear. The Court accepted the respondents' statement that a sum of Rs. 2 lacs was paid to the Arbitrator as compliance with a previous order. Held that nothing survived in the petition and disposed of it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
M/S ELECTRONIC ENTERPRISES ..... Petitioner Through: None. versus
RAJESH KUMAR SINGH & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, Advocate for UOI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL O R D E R % 08.03.2019
VINOD GOEL, J
MARCH 08, 2019
“sandeep”
M/s Electronic Enterprises
Rajesh Kumar Singh
Vinod Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
