Petitioner in a contempt petition was present in absentia on two occasions; the High Court of Delhi dismissed the petition for default and nonprosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~
. ..... Petitioner
versus
PROF. DEEPAK NAYYAR & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: None
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
ORDER (ORAL)
% 16.01.2019
1. Despite the matter having been called out twice, there is no appearance on behalf of either of the parties.
2. The contempt petition is dismissed in default and for nonprosecution.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J
JANUARY 16, 2019 dsn
PRABHAT KUMAR
PROF. DEEPAK NAYYAR & ORS.
C. HARI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
