The writ petition was dismissed in default and for nonprosecution as the petitioner failed to appear and had not appeared on the preceding two dates, indicating lack of interest in prosecuting the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 15th January, 2019
SOCIETY FOR INDIAN INSTITUTE OF RURAL MANAGEMENT ..... Petitioner
Through: None
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Kaml Kant Jha, Sr. Panel Counsel for R-1 with Mr. Siddharth Jha, Mr. Prabhakar Thakur and Mr. Krishna Kumar, Advs.
Mr. Anil Soni, Standing Counsel for AICTE with Mr. Abhhinav Tyagi, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
ORDER (ORAL) % 15.01.2019
1. There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. It is noticed that there has been no appearance on behalf of the petitioner on the last two dates either.
2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this matter. This writ petition is dismissed in default and for nonprosecution.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J
JANUARY 15, 2019/ bh
SOCIETY FOR INDIAN INSTITUTE OF RURAL MANAGEMENT
UNION OF INDIA
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
