Dismissed
Anuj Aggarwal v. Payal
Delhi HCCONT.CAS(C)/520/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner failed to appear despite prior notices. Court dismissed the petition in default and for non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~4
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CONT.CAS(C) 520/2017
¶4
ANUJ AGGARWAL ..... Petitioner Through: None.
¶5
versus
¶6
PAYAL ..... Respondent Through: None.
¶7
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
¶8
O R D E R % 15.01.2019
¶9
- Despite the matter being passed over twice, there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the petition.
¶10
- The petition is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.
¶11
VINOD GOEL, J.
¶12
JANUARY 15, 2019
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Anuj Aggarwal
- respondent
Payal
Coram
AI extract
Vinod Goel
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court