The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition after the respondent complied with the impugned order. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~37
NEW JAI MATA DI PRIVATE ITI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Advocate with Mr. Divyank Rana and Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advs.
versus
S D LAHIRI & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. P.S. Singh, Senior Panel Counsel, Advocate for UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition since the compliance has been made by the respondent. As such, the petition along with application being C.M. No.1825/2019 is dismissed as withdrawn.
VINOD GOEL, J.
JANUARY 18, 2019
“sandeep”
New Jai Mata Di Private ITI
S D Lahiri & Anr
Vinod Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
