Petitioner sought withdrawal of the petition after submission that the matter between the parties was settled in the Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
None; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~37
ATUL SHARMA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rajeshwar K. Gupta, Advocate.
versus
NARENDER VASHISHTHA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA O R D E R % 14.03.2019
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the matter has been settled between the parties on 25.02.2019 in the Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre and learned Counsel for the petitioner thus seeks to withdraw the present petition, which is thus dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed.
ANU MALHOTRA, J
MARCH 14, 2019/NC
Atul Sharma
Narender Vashishta & Ors
Anu Malhotra
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
