The High Court of Delhi directed the Trial Court to dispose of pending applications under Order XXXIX Rules 1, 2, 4 and Order 7 Rules 10, 11 of the CPC by May 15, 2019, before the learned Trial Court.
Directed Trial Court to dispose of Order XXXIX Rules 1, 2, 4 and Order 7 Rules 10, 11 applications by 15.05.2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~47
Through Mr. A.K. Singla, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Shailen Bhatia, Ms. Ekta Nagar, Mr. Amit Jain, Ms. Neelam Pathak, Ms. Vidushi Chandra, Ms. Saltanat, Advs.
versus
ABDUL NASIR (NOW DECEASED) & ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sridharan Ram Kumar, Adv. for R1 & R2 on advance notice.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA
O R D E R
% 15.03.2019 CM APPL. 12294/2019
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application is disposed of.
CM(M) 443/2019 & CM APPL. 12293/2019
Through submissions that have been brought forth on behalf of either side, it is indicated that vide order dated 06.12.2017 of this Court in FAO 477/2017, the learned Trial Court had been called upon to make an endeavour to dispose of the applications under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of the CPC and under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the CPC at the earliest after hearing arguments on the same on 18.12.2017 or on the date fixed soon thereafter with the application under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the CPC having been filed by the present petitioner and the application under Order CM(M) 443/2019 page 1 of 2
page 1 of 2
XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of the CPC having been filed by the respondent i.e. the plaintiff of the suit.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner herein that the said applications have not yet been disposed of in relation to which a submission has been made on behalf of the respondents qua the proceedings dated 21.07.2018 of the learned Trial Court in TM No. 150/17 whereby it is indicated that the matter is pending in view of the repeated applications having been filed by the petitioner i.e. applications under Order 7 Rule 10 of the CPC and under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC qua which the matter had been heard on 21.07.2018 and the same was reserved for orders in relation thereto and it has thus been submitted that the delay, if any, is caused due to the filing of the applications by the petitioner.
In the circumstances, it is considered appropriate that it would suffice that the learned Trial Court disposes of the applications under Order 7 Rule 10 of the CPC, under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC, under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of the CPC and under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the CPC by the date 15.05.2019.
The petition and the accompanying applications are disposed of accordingly.
Copy of this order be sent to the learned Trial Court.
Copy of the order be given Dasti, as prayed.
ANU MALHOTRA, J
MARCH 15, 2019/MK
page 2 of 2
CM(M) 443/2019
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Trial Court should be directed to dispose of pending interim applications under Order XXXIX Rules 1, 2, and 4 along with Order 7 Rules 10 and 11 by a specific date.
Whether the delay in disposal of the applications was caused by the petitioner's filings.
4 provisions across 1 enactments
Abdullah Sheikh
Abdul Nasir
Anu Malhotra
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
