This order disposed of the petition as there was no need for further jurisdiction by this Court since the Senior Civil Judge, South was already seized of an interim injunction application under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC. Respondent no.1 submitted that no further construction would be raised on the suit property.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~50
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA
It has been submitted by the learned counsel Mr. Deepak Kohli for the respondent no.1 that he would file his vakalatnama during the course of the day, which be filed accordingly and submits that no further construction is being raised nor will be raised by the respondent no.1 at the terrace of the suit property.
In view of the said submission made on behalf of the respondent no.1, there is no cause for any further action in the matter. The petition is disposed of, in as much as the learned Trial Court of the learned Senior Civil Judge, South is already seized of the application under Order XXXIX Rule 2 A of the CPC.
The respondent no.1 shall be bound by the submission made by his counsel.
ANU MALHOTRA, J
MARCH 14, 2019/NC
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nirmal Singh Sawhney
Arvind Arora
Anu Malhotra
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
