The High Court of Delhi dismissed a writ petition challenging a show cause notice issued by the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal. The petitioner was given liberty to seek remedies if aggrieved by the statutory order.
The petition and pending application are dismissed; exemption allowed subject to exceptions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
PRITPAL SINGH & ANR ..... Petitioner Through: Ms.Nidhi Saini for Ms.Usha Singh, Advocates.
versus STATE BANK OF PATIALA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajiv Kapur, Ms.Khushboo Kapur, Mr.Sourav Singh Tomar and Ms.Shubhangi Rathore, Advocates.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
O R D E R % 11.09.2019
CM APPL. 40329/2019 (Exemption)
W.P.(C) 9756/2019 & CM APPL. 40328/2019
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
TALWANT SINGH, J. SEPTEMBER 11, 2019/ pa
Pritpal Singh & Anr.
State Bank of Patiala
S. Muralidhar
Talwant Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
