Dismissed
Dilbag Singh v. UOI
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/12282/2005
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear in court despite a pass-over.
What did the court decide?
The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~6
¶2
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(C) 12282/2005
¶4
DILBAG SINGH ..... Petitioner
¶5
Through: None.
¶6
versus
¶7
UOI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Archana Gaur, Advocate for UOI.
¶8
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
¶9
O R D E R % 05.09.2019
¶10
- None appears for the Petitioner despite a pass-over.
¶11
- Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. The restoration application, if any, will be entertained only if an appropriate affidavit is filed by the Petitioner in support thereof.
¶12
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Dilbag Singh
- respondent
UOI
Coram
AI extract
S. Muralidhar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court