Dismissed
R.K.Yadav v. UOI & Ors.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/7764/2000
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution as no representative appeared for the petitioner. Restoration is contingent on filing an affidavit.
What did the court decide?
The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~R-4
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(C) 7764/2000
¶4
R.K. YADAV ..... Petitioner
¶5
Through None
¶6
versus
¶7
UOI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through None
¶8
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
¶9
O R D E R % 11.09.2019
¶10
- None appears for the Petitioner despite a passover.
¶11
- Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. The restoration application, if any, will be entertained only if an appropriate affidavit is filed by the Petitioner in support thereof.
¶12
S.MURALIDHAR, J
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
R.K. Yadav
- respondent
UOI & ORS.
Coram
AI extract
S. Muralidhar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court