This order dismissed a petition by an ITBP Head Constable seeking Patient Care Allowance. The court noted that the administrative orders relied upon to grant such allowances to similar officers had been withdrawn, leaving no case for relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MOHD. ISLAM BAITHA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr R.K. Shukla, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Vivekanand Mishra, Advocate.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
O R D E R % 05.09.2019
“1. None appears for the petitioner even at the second call.
W.P. (C) 3017 of 2014 Page 1 of 3
useful. The petitioner cannot therefore claim to be a professionally trained Medic.
“1. The petitioner, who is working at the post of Head Constable (GD) seeks a direction to the respondents to implement the order dated 22nd August, 2008 issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India and the Memorandum dated 4th February, 2013 for grant of HPCA/PCA.
W.P. (C) 3017 of 2014 Page 2 of 3
for petitioner.
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
TALWANT SINGH, J
SEPTEMBER 05, 2019
rd
W.P. (C) 3017 of 2014 Page
3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Head Constable/General Duty in ITBP entitled to Patient Care Allowance despite being in general duty cadre and lacking professional medical training.
Mohd. Islam Baitha
Union of India
S. Muralidhar
Talwant Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
