Petitioner withdrew writ petition W.P.(C) 8442/2017. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
RAHUL MANI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Sudhir Kumar, Adv.
versus
THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Bharathi Raju, CGSC for R-1. Mr. Saurav Agrawal, Mr. Aakriti Dawar, Mr. Anshuman Choudhary and Mr. Vibhu Anshuman, Advocates for R-3 & R-4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT O R D E R % 10.01.2019
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh, if so advised.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
The pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
JANUARY 10, 2019 ab
RAHUL MANI
THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
