Disposed

Pitam Singh & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.

Delhi HC9 Jan 2019W.P.(C)/207/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The bench observed that since the petition sought compensation, no purpose was served in keeping it pending. Upon multiple grounds, the court directed the accused to appear before the Land Acquisition Court on a specified date.

What did the court decide?

Directed appearance before the Land Acquisition Court on specified date for compensation determination; petition disposed of.

Pitam Singh & Anr. Vs Union of India & Anr. — Land Acquisition | Delhi HC (2019)

¶1

$~21

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 207/2016

¶4

PITAM SINGH & ANR ..... Petitioners

¶5

Through: Mr. Arun Kumar Kaushik, Advocate.

¶6

versus

¶7

UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for LAC/L&B. Mr. Pawan Mathur, Advocate for DDA.

¶8

CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

¶9

O R D E R % 09.01.2019

¶10

A notice dated 3^rd July 2018 has been issued by the LAC to the Petitioners to appear before the LAC on 16^th July 2018 at 3:30 PM for “determination of the amount of compensation along with interest thereon under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894” in respect of the Award No. 44/82-83 in respect of the lands in the khasra Nos. 41/1 (5-10), 43 (3-03) and 44/1(0-10) located in the revenue estate Behlolpur Khadar. Counsel for the Petitioners informs that Petitioner No. 2 has expired and that an application for bring on record his legal representatives has been filed. The said application has, however, not been numbered yet and is not listed today.

¶11

Considering that the limited prayer in the present petition is for

¶12

Page 1 of 2

¶13

W.P.(C) 207/2016

¶14

compensation to be paid to the Petitioners, the Court sees no purpose in keeping the present petition pending. It is directed that Petitioner No.1 and the legal representatives of Petitioner No.2 will appear before the LAC on 30^th January 2019 at 3:30 PM with the relevant papers in their possession and the LAC will after examining those documents pass appropriate orders preferably within a period of four weeks thereafter in respect of the claim for compensation and interest. If the Petitioners are aggrieved by the orders passed by the LAC, it will be open to them to seek appropriate remedies in accordance with law.

¶15

The petition is disposed of in the above terms.

¶16

S. MURALIDHAR, J.

¶17

SANJEEV NARULA, J.

¶18

JANUARY 09, 2019 nk

¶19

Page 2 of 2

¶20

W.P.(C) 207/2016

Pitam Singh & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pitam Singh & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. (Ms.) Banti M. Singh Vs University of Delhi and Anr.

Bipin Kumar Yadav and Ors. Vs New Delhi Municipal Council

Hemant Verma @ Hemant Gogna Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

H. K. Sharma Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Bir Singh & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Gurvinder Pal Singh Vs State Bank of India

Bharat Sehrawat Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Jeetendra Meena & Ors. Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

G. Jai Sankar and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Manoj Kumar Singh Vs Union of India & Ors.

Pushpender Singh Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Satish & Ors. Vs the Honble Lieutenant Governor & Ors.

Qayamuddin Vs Union of India & Ors.

Ranvir Singh & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors.