The petitioner failed to appear on the last date of hearing. The court dismissed the writ petition in default and for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~R-11AA
RAJNIKANT SWAMI ..... Petitioner Through: None.
versus
DELHI AGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD AND ANR ..... Respondents Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT O R D E R % 14.01.2019
None appears on behalf of the petitioner on the last date of hearing i.e. 07.12.2018. So is the position today. It seems that the petitioner is no more interested to prosecute the present matter.
The petition is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution as well.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
JANUARY 14, 2019 rd
RAJNIKANT SWAMI
DELHI AGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD AND ANR
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
