On 19.01.2017 the petitioner appeared before the Estate Officer and requested for statement in order to calculate and understand the outstanding amount. On 05.05.2017 the Estate Officer passed an eviction order and also an order of damages. An appeal under Section 9 of the Act, filed by the petitioner, was also dismissed. It is alleged by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has neither sublet the premises nor has changed the user of the premises and that he has been writing various letters in this regard and also for restoration of the licence deed but such requests were of no avail and now since the eviction order has been passed without verifying as to if the petitioner is carrying on the business of garments in the premises, the impugned order is liable to be set aside. Even otherwise, it is submitted the change of business does not violate any condition of the licence deed as the market in question is free trade zone and sale of packed food items does not fall in negative list issued by the respondent and it does not need any licence from the competent authority and per trade policy/guidelines issued by the respondent, the
