Satish Kumar Jain v. Vishal Moondhra & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The court granted the petitioner two years to vacate the premises and reduced user/occupation charges to Rs.12,000 per month from March 1, 2019, payable with a threat of immediate eviction for default.
What did the court decide?
Time granted to vacate; user/occupation charges reduced to Rs.12,000 per month; threat of immediate eviction for default.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12 & 13
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 128/2017 & CM APPL Nos.10893/2017, 1167/2018, 8066/2018, 8067/2018
SATISH KUMAR JAIN
Through : Mr.Madan Lal Sharma, Advocate
versus
VISHAL MOONDHRA & ORS
..... Respondents Through : Ms.Ritu Sobti, Mr.S.S.Sobti and Mr.Ajay Kohli, Advocates
- RC.REV. 159/2017 & CM APPL Nos.13039/2017, 1158/2018, 8062/2018, 8063/2018 SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN
..... Petitioner
Through : Mr.Madan Lal Sharma, Advocate
versus
VISHAL MOONDHRA & ORS
..... Respondents Through : Ms.Ritu Sobti, Mr.S.S.Sobti and Mr.Ajay Kohli, Advocates
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Satish Kumar Jain
- respondent
Vishal Moondhra
Coram
Yogesh Khanna
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court