Partly allowed

M/S Inditex India Pvt. Ltd. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC10 Jul 2019W.P.(C)/6858/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought permission to operate after its Consent to Operate elapsed. Court admitted the consent was expired and dismissed the petition as a matter of statutory compliance, directing authorities to process the renewed application expeditiously and restore utilities if approved.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed; direction to process Consent to Operate request expeditiously and restore utilities if consent is issued.

M/S Inditex India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi… — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2019)

¶1

$~46

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 6858/2019

¶4

M/S INDITEX INDIA PVT LTD ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr Pradeep K. Bakshi and Mr Kushagra Pandit, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Harpreet S. Popli and Mr Anuj Yadav, Advocate for R-1. Mr Sumit Pushkarna with Mr Kush Sharma, Advocates for R-2/DPCC with Mr Dinesh Jindal, Law Officer.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 10.07.2019

¶9

CM No.28586/2019

¶10

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶11

W.P.(C) 6858/2019 & CM No. 28585/2019

¶12

At the outset, it is conceded by the learned counsel appearing for the parties that the issue involved in the present petition is covered by the decision rendered by this Court in Modella Hospitality Private Limited v. The Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.: W.P.(C) 6940/2019 and other connected matters decided on 01.07.2019 .

¶13

Admittedly, the petitioner does not have the Consent to Operate as required under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981.

¶14

Mr Bakshi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner earnestly contends that the petitioner has complied with all pollution laws and had obtained the necessary Consent to Operate, which was valid till 10.03.2019. He states that the said consent has not been renewed and therefore, the same has elapsed. He states that the petitioner has already taken steps for obtaining the Consent to Operate and therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to operate its unit.

¶15

The aforesaid contention is unpersuasive. The petitioner is not permitted to operate the unit without obtaining the necessary consent. Since it is the petitioner’s admitted case that the said Consent to Operate has elapsed, no relief can be granted by this Court. The grant of such relief would be contrary to the provisions of the relevant statutes. 6. The respondents will process the petitioner’s request for Consent to Operate as expeditiously as possible and in any event, within the time as directed by this Court in the order dated 21.06.2019.

¶16

It is also directed that if the Delhi Pollution Control Committee finds the petitioner’s request in order and issues the Consent to Operate as requested, other concerned authorities shall ensure that the utilities disconnected to the petitioner’s unit are restored forthwith. The petition is dismissed with the aforesaid observations.

¶17

VIBHU BAKHRU, J

¶18

JULY 10, 2019 MK

M/S Inditex India Pvt. Ltd. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Inditex India Pvt. Ltd. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Maa Jagdamba Traders Vs Commissioner, Value Added Tax

Krishna Vs Union of India through Secretary (Home) & Ors.

Mrs. Madhu Bawa and Anr. Vs Central Bank of India and Anr.

Anushna Estate Private Limited Vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Hqrs -1 & Ors.

Vidhan Chatterjee Vs East Delhi Municipal Corporation

Shyam Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.

N P Ashley and Ors. Vs the University of Delhi and Ors.

Rajeshwer Kumar Gupta Vs Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd.

Mkj Developers Ltd. and Anr. Vs Collector of Stamps Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi

Shri Ashok Maheshwari Vs State (Nct of Delhi) and Ors.

Ravi Kumar Vs Union of India & Anr.

Shri Pooran Singh Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Damanjit Kaur Vs Union of India

Sandeep Singh Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.