Consequently, the respondents were directed to produce the record in relation to the petitioner‟s medical examination. Today, learned counsel for the respondents has tendered in Court the certified copies of the medical examination of the petitioner undertaken on 12.3.2018 by the Senior Medical officer at Hospital, Regional Training Centre, Arakkonam. The Out-Patient Slip records that during examination the petitioner was found to have defective color vision. He was referred to Ophthalmologist Government/CGHS Hospital for evaluation of color vision. The appellate order dated 2.4.2019 records that there were two contradictory reports, namely, the report dated 12.3.2019 finding him UNFIT, and other in favour of the petitioner where he was found to be medically fit and, consequently, he was sent for medical examination by the Review Board to the Composite Hospital, CRPF, Ajmer, Rajasthan. The respondents have produced the record relating to the petitioner‟s medical examination at Composite Hospital, CRPF, Ajmer, Rajasthan. Proceedings of the Board-consisting of three doctors who were specialists have also been produced, which show that the said Board examined six candidates out of whom five were found to be UNFIT- including the petitioner, and only one was found fit. It is not the petitioner‟s case that the respondents have acted malafidely. No such allegation has been made. He pleaded that since there are two contrary reports, the petitioner may be referred to some other Hospital for reexamination.
