In this writ petition, the petitioner sought directions for a fresh passport with the correct place of birth. The court directed the respondent to treat the petition as a representation and decide within six weeks.
Direction to respondent no.2 to consider the request for passport correction and the petition as a representation within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~31
RAVI KUMAR ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr Amit Kumar, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr Ashutosh Ghade and Mr Nikhil Goel, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 09.07.2019
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
JULY 09, 2019/MK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether directions should be issued to the respondents to consider the petitioner's request for correction of his place of birth in his passport.
RAVI KUMAR
UNION OF INDIA
ANR
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
