The High Court dismissed a batch of writ petitions. The petitioner's counsel submitted that a new policy decision by the respondent to discontinue online examinations redressed the grievances, leading to the withdrawal of the petitions.
None. The writ petitions were dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified \ Signed By:RAM DATT Signing Date:18.10.2024 16:10 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file an d no page is missing.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
ORDERrORAU^
%
06.05.2019
C.HART A IKAR, J
MAY 06, 2019/kr
, ■{
Page 2 of2
W.P.(C) .4811/2019 & other connected matters
The Petitioner
The Respondent
C. HARI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
