Disposed
Haaris Rasheed & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/862/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20.
HAARIS RASHEED & ORS. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao with Mr. Ankur Khandelwal and Mr. Gowrang, Advs.
| versus | ||
|---|---|---|
| UNION OF INDIA AND OR | S. ..... Responden |
t |
| Through: | Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC with | Ms. |
| Manisha Saroha and Mr. Abhi | shek | |
| Chaudhary, Advs for R-1 to R-3. | ||
| Mr. Naresh Kaushik with |
Mr. | |
| Lakshay Juneja, Advs. for R-4. |
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
%
O R D E R 07.02.2019
C.M. No. 3903/2019
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 862/2019 & C.M. Nos. 3904,3905/2019
The petitioners have preferred this writ petition without first approaching the Tribunal.
The submission of Mr. Rao is that since the Tribunal has already rendered its decision, which is against the interest of the petitioners, there was no purpose in first approaching the Tribunal. He points out that W.P.
(C) No. 109/2019, Himanshu Kumar Verma and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors., is already pending consideration before this Court wherein the decision of the Tribunal is under examination. The petitioners have also moved an application i.e. C.M. No. 3905/2019 to seek leave for listing of the petition before this Court without first approaching the Tribunal.
Issue notice. Counsel for the respondents accept notice. Counter affidavit(s), if any, be filed within 4 weeks. Rejoinder be filed before the next date of hearing.
List on 08.04.2019 along with W.P. (C) No. 109/2019.
The petitioners may also move an application in W.P. (C) No. 109/2019 to seek leave to intervene in the matter.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
VINOD GOEL, J
FEBRUARY 07, 2019 N.Khanna
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Himanshu Kumar Verma and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.Referred¶13
W.P. (C) No. 109/2019, Himanshu Kumar Verma and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
HAARIS RASHEED & ORS.
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
VIPIN SANGHI
VINOD GOEL
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court