Disposed

Manish Kumar and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

Delhi HC3 May 2019W.P.(C)/864/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a listing order in W.P.(C) 864/2019. The Court addressed the submission that the Tribunal's decision was adversarial to petitioners. Notice was issued to respondents, and the matter was listed for further hearing alongside a related pending writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Notice issued to respondents; matter listed on 08.04.2019 along with W.P.(C) No. 109/2019.

Manish Kumar and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors. — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Delhi HC (2019)

¶1

$~21.

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 864/2019

¶4

MANISH KUMAR AND ORS. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao with Mr. Ankur Khandelwal and Mr. Gowrang, Advs.

¶5

versus
UNION OF INDIA AND OR	S. ..... Responden	t
Through:	Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC with	Ms.
	Manisha Saroha and Mr. Abhi	shek
	Chaudhary, Advs for R-1 to R-3.
	Mr. Naresh Kaushik with	Mr.
	Lakshay Juneja, Advs. for R-4.

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL

¶7

¶8

O R D E R 07.02.2019

¶9

C.M. No. 3906/2019

¶10

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.

¶11

W.P.(C) 864/2019 & C.M. Nos. 3907,3908/2019

¶12

The petitioners have preferred this writ petition without first approaching the Tribunal.

¶13

The submission of Mr. Rao is that since the Tribunal has already rendered its decision, which is against the interest of the petitioners, there was no purpose in first approaching the Tribunal. He points out that W.P.

¶14

(C) No. 109/2019, Himanshu Kumar Verma and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors., is already pending consideration before this Court wherein the decision of the Tribunal is under examination. The petitioners have also moved an application i.e. C.M. No. 3908/2019 to seek leave for listing of the petition before this Court without first approaching the Tribunal.

¶15

Issue notice. Counsel for the respondents accept notice. Counter affidavit(s), if any, be filed within 4 weeks. Rejoinder be filed before the next date of hearing.

¶16

List on 08.04.2019 along with W.P. (C) No. 109/2019.

¶17

The petitioners may also move an application in W.P. (C) No. 109/2019 to leave to intervene in the matter.

¶18

VIPIN SANGHI, J

¶19

VINOD GOEL, J

¶20

FEBRUARY 07, 2019 N.Khanna

Manish Kumar and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manish Kumar and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hajra Topia Vs Union of India and Ors.

S. Sadachari Sai Baba Om Ji Vs Union of India & Ors.

Rajesh Kumar Gupta Vs UOI and Ors.

Bano Devi and Anr. Vs National Commission for Scheduled Castes

Laxmi Devi Vs the Chairman Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

M/S Agson Global Private Limited Vs Additional Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.

Shanti Devi (Senior Citizen) Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.

Niji Audyogik Prashikshan Sanchalak Sangathan Vs Directorate General of Training

Sidharth Kunj Cghs Ltd. and Ors. Vs Shri Ravi Prakash Yadav and Anr.

Vijay Singh & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Tushar Ranjan Mohanty Vs Union of India and Anr.

Himanshu Kumar Verma and Anr. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Haaris Rasheed & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Ajay Gandhi and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.