Petitioner sought to withdraw the present petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
NC BAKSHI ..... Petitioner
Through Mr Aditya Madan, Advocate.
versus
DELHI & DISTRICT CRICKET ASSOCIATION & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr Sangram Patnaik, Mr Swamsiddha Patnaik, Mr Madhav Chaturvedi, Advocates for R1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 06.02.2019
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
FEBRUARY 06, 2019 pkv
NC BAKSHI
DELHI & DISTRICT CRICKET ASSOCIATION
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
