Petitioners sought to withdraw writ petition challenging Section 164 of Companies Act 2013. Court allowed withdrawal with liberty to file afresh and dismissed main petition.
Petition withdrawn with liberty to file afresh challenging Section 164 of Companies Act, 2013. Pending application disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
ANIL KUMAR AGARWAL AND ANR. ..... Petitioners
Through: Ms Meenakshi Sood and Mr Atul Barthwal, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R
% 05.02.2019
CM No. 5455/2019
W.P.(C) 649/2019 & CM No.5454/2019
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
FEBRUARY 05, 2019 MK
Anil Kumar Agarwal
Union of India
Vibhu Bakhru
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
