Single judge order converting a PIL regarding road closure for protests at Mandi House into a representation to be disposed of by Respondents 3 & 4 based on police permissions and public traffic impact.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~40
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 09.12.2019
BAJRANG VATS ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.Bajrang Vats, petitioner in person.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Adv. with Mr.Aaryan Verma, Adv. for R-1/UOI. Mr.Naman Jain, Adv. for Mr.Sanjoy Ghose, Adv. for R-3, 4 & 5. Insp.Pharlad Singh, SHO, PS Barakhamba Road.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R
D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL)
WP(C) No.12966/2019 Page 1 of 2
House Periphery) and Bhagwan Dass Road (Two-way from red light on Tilak Marg to Mandi House Periphery) for public traffic immediately. c) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ/ directions to Respondents to not permit/allow use of a public road for a protest and d) Issue further necessary directions/guidelines to the respondents to deal with such situations in future and for fixing the liabilities of the wrongdoers/illegal protestors/authorities as deem necessary by this Hon’ble Court.”
CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
DECEMBER 09, 2019/aa
WP(C) No.12966/2019 Page 2 of 2
Bajrang Vats
Union of India
Sanjoy Ghose
D.N. Patel
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
