Court dismissed the writ petition as it was not pressed forward by counsel who submitted that grievances were resolved.
Writ petition disposed of as not pressed. Interim relief vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
M/S KOHINOOR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit Gautam, Adv.
versus
COMMISSIONER OF VAT, BIKRI KAR BHAWAN AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Dhananjaya Mishra, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
%
O R D E R 09.12.2019
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the grievances ventilated in this writ petition have been brought to an end. Hence, this writ petition is not pressed at this stage.
In view of this submission, this writ petition is disposed of as not pressed. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated.
CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
DECEMBER 09, 2019 kks
M/S Kohinoor India Private Limited
Commissioner of VAT
Bikri Kar Bhawan
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
