The High Court of Delhi, where the petitioner sought leave to withdraw a writ petition through counsel, dispensed with a hearing following substantial arguments, preferring to dismiss the W.P.
withdrawal of the writ petition allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~59
M/S APPRECIATE FINCAP PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Kapil Goel and Mr. Dhananjay Garg, Advocates.
versus
DEPUTY COMMSSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Anand, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Vipul Agarwal, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI O R D E R
% 06.12.2019
VIPIN SANGHI, J
REKHA PALLI, J
DECEMBER 06, 2019 nk
M/S APPRECIATE FINCAP PVT. LTD.
DEPUTY COMMSSIONER OF INCOME TAX
VIPIN SANGHI
REKHA PALLI
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
