Allowed

Ankitha Murthy v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi HC6 Dec 2019W.P.(C)/11234/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged passport renewal refusal based on father ceasing to be Indian citizen. Court held father lost citizenship via acquisition of foreign citizenship (Section 9), not renunciation (Section 8). Petitioner entitled to renewal. Impugned orders quashed; renewal directed within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Impugned orders quashed; respondent directed to renew petitioner's passport within four weeks.

Ankitha Murthy Vs Union of India & Ors. — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Delhi HC (2019)

¶1

$~25

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

Date of Decision: 06.12.2019

¶4

- W.P.(C) 11234/2019 & CM No.46259/2019 (stay)

¶5

ANKITHA MURTHY ..... Petitioner Through Mr.S.P. Singh, Adv. with Mr.Harmeet Singh, Adv. & Mr.Dhruv Tamta, Adv.

¶6

versus

¶7

UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Manish Mohan, CGSC with Ms.Manisha Saroha, Adv. for R-1 to 3.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR

¶9

JUDGMENT

¶10

D.N. PATEL, Chief Justice (Oral)

¶11

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that suffice it will be for the disposal of this petition if a suitable direction is issued to the respondents for renewal of the passport of the petitioner, which is otherwise expired on 29.10.2017, in accordance with the Passports Act, 1967.

¶12

Having heard counsel for both the sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the date of birth of the petitioner is 26.10.2004 and the place of birth is Bengaluru, India. Therefore, the petitioner is an Indian citizen by birth.

¶13

W.P.(C) No.11234/2019 Page 1 of 5

¶14

The petitioner joined the BGS National Public School at Bengaluru in 2017 and prior thereto, in Twinklers School, Bengaluru. 4. The petitioner’s mother who was also holding the Indian passport expired on 29.03.2010. Soon thereafter, the petitioner’s father migrated to United Kingdom and started practicing medicine there. The petitioner resides with her local guardians in Bengaluru and all of them are Indian citizens by birth. 5. On 30.10.2012, an Indian passport was issued to the petitioner by Regional Passport Officer, Bengaluru which was valid upto 29.10.2017.

¶15

It appears from the facts of the case that this petitioner, in advance applied for renewal of her passport and the same was refused vide order dated 20.02.2019 (Annexure P-7 (colly) at Page 37 to the memo of this petition) by the Regional Passport Officer, Bengaluru, under the proviso to Section 8(2) of the Citizenship Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act, 1955”) on the ground that the petitioner’s father ceases to be an Indian citizen.

¶16

Being aggrieved/dissatisfied by the aforesaid order dated 20.02.2019, passed by the Regional Passport Officer, an appeal was preferred by the petitioner before Chief Passport Officer who has also dismissed the appeal vide an order dated 04.09.2019 (Annexure P-9 to the memo of this petition) which is challenged in this writ petition.

¶17

Looking to Sections 8 and 9 of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which read as under:-

¶18

“ 8. Renunciation of citizenship . - (1) If any citizen of

¶19

W.P.(C) No.11234/2019 Page 2 of 5

¶20

India of full age and capacity, who is also a citizen or national of another country, makes in the prescribed manner a declaration renouncing his Indian citizenship, the declaration shall be registered by the prescribed authority; and upon such registration, that person shall cease to be a citizen of India:

¶21

Provided that if any such declaration is made during any war in which India may be engaged, registration thereof shall be withheld until the Central Government otherwise directs .

¶22

(2) Where a person ceases to be a citizen of India under sub-section (1), every minor child of that person shall thereupon cease to be a citizen of India:

¶23

Provided that any such child may, within one year after attaining full age, make a declaration that he wishes to resume Indian citizenship and shall thereupon again become a citizen of India .

¶24

Termination of citizenship . - .- (1) Any citizen of India who by naturalisation, registration otherwise voluntarily acquires, or has at any time between the 26^th January, 1950 and the commencement of this Act, voluntarily acquired the citizenship of another country shall, upon such acquisition or, as the case may be, such commencement, cease to be a citizen of India:

¶25

Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall apply to a citizen of India who, during any war in which India may be engaged, voluntarily acquires the citizenship of another country, until the Central Government otherwise directs .

¶26

(2) If any question arises as to whether, when or how any citizen of India has acquired the citizenship of another country, it shall be determined by such authority,

¶27

W.P.(C) No.11234/2019 Page 3 of 5

¶28

in such manner, and having regard to such rules of evidence, as may be prescribed in this behalf . ”

¶29

It appears from the writ record that the father of this petitioner has permanently migrated to the United Kingdom and thus cease to be a citizen of India under Section 9 of the Act, 1955. The father of the petitioner has never made, in a prescribed manner, a declaration renouncing his Indian citizenship, whereas Section 8(2) of the Act, 1955 is applicable only when the citizenship has been renounced .

¶30

In the present case, the father of the petitioner has never renounced his citizenship of India. This aspect of the matter has not been properly appreciated by neither Regional Passport Officer, Bengaluru, while passing the order dated 20.02.2019 nor by the Chief Passport Officer while dismissing the appeal preferred thereagainst, vide order dated 04.04.2019. Hence both these orders are hereby quashed and set aside.

¶31

In the facts and circumstances of the present case, Section 9 of the Act, 1955 is applicable and not Section 8(2) of the Act, 1955. Therefore, the petitioner is legally entitled for renewal of the passport subject to fulfilling the other requisite conditions for renewal.

¶32

In view of the above, we hereby direct the respondent nos.1 & 2 to renew the passport of the petitioner in accordance with law, rules, regulations and Government policy and subject to the aforesaid observations of this Court, subject to other procedural aspect and payment of the necessary fee by the petitioner and subject to the production of necessary documents which are required in accordance with law.

¶33

W.P.(C) No.11234/2019 Page 4 of 5

¶34

It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that passport renewal application bearing No.BN1070675616317 is already preferred by this petitioner. This application is hereby revived with all annexures and documents annexed therewith by the petitioner and the respondent nos.1 & 2 will appreciate this application of the petitioner, which is supported by the documents already given to the respondents. The respondent nos.1 & 2 shall take immediate steps for processing the application of renewal of the passport preferably within a period of four weeks from today.

¶35

With these observations/directions, this writ petition is allowed. CM No.46259/2019 (stay)

¶36

In view of the orders passed in this writ petition, this application has become infructuous and the same stands disposed of.

¶37

CHIEF JUSTICE

¶38

C.HARI SHANKAR, J

¶39

DECEMBER 06, 2019/aa

¶40

W.P.(C) No.11234/2019 Page 5 of 5

Ankitha Murthy v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ankitha Murthy v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Promila Kumar Vs Income Tax Officer Ward 69(1) & Anr.

Jamia Cooperative Bank Limited Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Prem Singh Vs Northern Railway through Chief Commercial Manager (Pm) & Ors.

Deepak & Co. & Anr. Vs Indian Railways Catering & Tourism Corporation Ltd. & Anr.

Bajrang Vats Vs Union of India and Ors.

Sikander Kumar Verma Vs Union of India and Ors.

Mr. Omesh Chandra Vs the Registrar of Co- Operative Societies and Ors.

M/S Jamia Hamdard Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation

Vivek Talwar & Anr. Vs Amit Talwar & Ors.

Anterrashtriya Upabohkta Vs Union of India and Ors.

Panchshila Co-Operative House Building Society Ltd. Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Court on Its Own Motion Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Court on Its Own Motion Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Polyglass Acrylic Mfg. Pvt. Ltd., Vs the Assistant Commissioner of Customs (Refund) Icd Tughlakabad, Import, New Delhi.