Petition sought to be withdrawn. Court dismissed the petition accordingly along with the pending application.
Dismissed the petition as withdrawn along with the pending application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~34
MR. CHANDER MOHAN AGARWAL AND ANR...... Petitioners Through: Mr.J.S. Rawat, Adv.
versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (THROUGH ITS COMMSSIONER) ..... Respondent Through: Mr.R.K. Ranjan, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
O R D E R % 08.01.2019
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has instructions to state that the petition has become infructuous and therefore, seeks leave to withdraw the same.
The petition is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn along with the pending application.
REKHA PALLI, J
JANUARY 08, 2019 gm
Mr. Chander Mohan Agarwal and Anr.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation (Through Its Commissioner)
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
